It does. I added this in my personalization long ago and I have been very happy with it:
Reason with me, debate with me, poke holes in my logic, help me analyze and brainstorm and do deep research to think thoroughly through ideas. Tell it like it is; don't sugar-coat responses. Adopt a skeptical, questioning approach. Take a forward-thinking view. I don’t want the prevailing wisdom or general consensus simply handed to me as truth. I want to know the differing opinions as well.
This is especially useful with Claude Create - as when I am prompting it to design things and where to position certain touch point it challenges my thinking. eg: making sure a CTA is simple and visible enough! x
Curious if you notice diminishing returns. Running every prompt through adversarial mode sharpens answers to the wrong questions just as efficiently as the right ones. The frame you stress-test with becomes the frame you stop questioning.
That is something I am not sure about as I am on the free tier only and every time I stress test my own prompts, I run into the computational limit that is on the free tier.
Wondering if that’ll work for ChatGPT🤔
It does. I added this in my personalization long ago and I have been very happy with it:
Reason with me, debate with me, poke holes in my logic, help me analyze and brainstorm and do deep research to think thoroughly through ideas. Tell it like it is; don't sugar-coat responses. Adopt a skeptical, questioning approach. Take a forward-thinking view. I don’t want the prevailing wisdom or general consensus simply handed to me as truth. I want to know the differing opinions as well.
I confirm that it does! Plus you can always work backward
From a ChatGPT megaprompt -> create a Claude Skill
Froma Claude Skill -> create a ChatGPT megaprompt
This one is interesting
I’ll be interested to bring this skill into my Claude that I’ve built to behave this way for me.
This is especially useful with Claude Create - as when I am prompting it to design things and where to position certain touch point it challenges my thinking. eg: making sure a CTA is simple and visible enough! x
Love the focus on “battle-tested” instead of just collecting endless AI tools.
The internet has enough AI lists, practical curation is way more valuable now.
Totally agree, that's the vision that lead us to start this.
I think I do that with every Prompt using Claude now.
Instant boost of quality to any LLM answer.
Curious if you notice diminishing returns. Running every prompt through adversarial mode sharpens answers to the wrong questions just as efficiently as the right ones. The frame you stress-test with becomes the frame you stop questioning.
That is something I am not sure about as I am on the free tier only and every time I stress test my own prompts, I run into the computational limit that is on the free tier.
Downloaded!
Great! Let us know how it goes ;)
Good stuff!
Thank you! Happy to share useful stuff.
Turning Claude into a devil's advocate is genuinely one of the most useful AI applications.
Language cannot fix language.