"Infinite Substack Notes" from one newsletter is the part I'd circle. Infinite from one idea usually means the same thought wearing ten hats, and the feed can tell.
The actual tool sounds fine and boring in the good way — reformatting your own writing so it fits the room. That's a real chore worth automating. It's the garnish I'd side-eye: a platform-wide "60% of subscribers come from Notes" stat and one person's 11 to 5,800 aren't promises your skill can hand anybody. Useful invention, sure. It doesn't need the growth-hormone copy.
Sure the 60% is not a promise: it's just a stat many creators report on, to convey the concept that Substack Notes are often an underused format and channel for creators wanting to grow : )
The thread I would pull is that repurposing is a memory problem at its root. Your long-form writing contains the raw material for a hundred Notes, and the reason most creators freeze at the blank Note is that their best material is never indexed against the moments it would serve. A skill that mines the archive with structural formulas is a good first move, and the second move is teaching the skill what the audience already responded to. The agents I'm building sit on top of a simple loop: every Note that earns replies gets tagged with the formula that produced it and the argument it carried, and the next mining run starts from what worked rather than from the whole archive. The post frames the skill as one piece producing multiple Notes; the extension is that the Notes should feed back into the mining, so the archive becomes a compounding asset instead of a static pile. Static repurposing gives you volume. Feedback gives you a house style.
Exactly. The notes that earn replies should set the target for the next mining run. Every newsletter is a content engine once its archive starts learning from the replies.
This is really 👍
Thank you!
Amazing!!!
"Infinite Substack Notes" from one newsletter is the part I'd circle. Infinite from one idea usually means the same thought wearing ten hats, and the feed can tell.
The actual tool sounds fine and boring in the good way — reformatting your own writing so it fits the room. That's a real chore worth automating. It's the garnish I'd side-eye: a platform-wide "60% of subscribers come from Notes" stat and one person's 11 to 5,800 aren't promises your skill can hand anybody. Useful invention, sure. It doesn't need the growth-hormone copy.
Sure the 60% is not a promise: it's just a stat many creators report on, to convey the concept that Substack Notes are often an underused format and channel for creators wanting to grow : )
The thread I would pull is that repurposing is a memory problem at its root. Your long-form writing contains the raw material for a hundred Notes, and the reason most creators freeze at the blank Note is that their best material is never indexed against the moments it would serve. A skill that mines the archive with structural formulas is a good first move, and the second move is teaching the skill what the audience already responded to. The agents I'm building sit on top of a simple loop: every Note that earns replies gets tagged with the formula that produced it and the argument it carried, and the next mining run starts from what worked rather than from the whole archive. The post frames the skill as one piece producing multiple Notes; the extension is that the Notes should feed back into the mining, so the archive becomes a compounding asset instead of a static pile. Static repurposing gives you volume. Feedback gives you a house style.
Nice feedback loop!
Exactly. The newsletter generates the note, the note pulls the comments, and the comments seed the next newsletter. The loop compounds.
Exactly. The notes that earn replies should set the target for the next mining run. Every newsletter is a content engine once its archive starts learning from the replies.
Wow, this is fabulous!
Thanks! Hope it helps you overcome any writers-block when it comes to growing on substack!
But doesn’t Substack flag all AI writing now?
So what? : )
The paradigm: human writing = good writing / ai writing = bad writing is simply false
Substack simpy informs people on what their tool detects, people still decide if and what to read!
Agree. Better to have help organizing my thoughts than not to write them at all.